Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum
Fatih Demir 1 *
More Detail
1 Bayburt University, Faculty of Education, Bayburt, Türkiye
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2024 - Volume 6 Issue 1, pp. 89-105
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930

Article Type: Research Article

Published Online: 14 Mar 2024

Views: 458 | Downloads: 323

ABSTRACT
The study aims to evaluate the child development associate degree program. In order to achieve this aim, this study was designed as a case study from qualitative research.  In the curriculum evaluation process, Stufflebeam's CIPP curriculum evaluation model was chosen. In the process of collecting data from an associate degree program in child development within the vocational school of a state university in Turkey, interviews were conducted with 64 associate degree students and six instructors working in this programme. The data obtained from the interviews were analyzed by content analysis method. Some of the results are as follows: According to the students, the content of the most effective courses in the program includes important information for their professional development, more new information, and includes the information needed in daily life. In addition, about the teaching learning processes of the course, if the courses are taught practically, if the instructor explains the course effectively and if he/she uses different methods/techniques, these courses are the most effective ones according to the students. In addition, the students expect that formative assesment should be included more in the curriculum and extracurricular activities such as visits to institutions, conferences/ seminars, and internships should be included in the curriculum. On the other hand, the instructors stated that the problems arising from the students and the deficiencies related to the physical facilities (infrastructure), such as students' lack of interest/willingness to the course, reduced the effectiveness of the program. Based on the results of the study, while developing associate degree child development programs, 21st-century skills should be included in the aim dimension and students' professional, academic and social development should be supported. In the teaching-learning process dimension, different methods-techniques and materials should be used to ensure that students engage in the course with interest and enthusiasm, and multiple assessment methods/tools should be used in the assessment and evaluation process. In addition, for the programs to be more effective, it can be suggested that extracurricular activities should be arranged to be more numerous and diverse. Also, it may be recommended to carry out curriculum evaluation studies by including different evaluation models and different stakeholders, comparative evaluation of curricula in different universities and different curriculum evaluation studies based on the students’ views.
KEYWORDS
curriculum evaluation child development associate degree
In-text citation: (Demir, 2024)
Reference: Demir, F. (2024). Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Demir F. Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2024;6(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Demir F. Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2024;6(1):89-105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930
In-text citation: (Demir, 2024)
Reference: Demir, Fatih. "Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2024 6 no. 1 (2024): 89-105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930
In-text citation: (Demir, 2024)
Reference: Demir, F. (2024). Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(1), pp. 89-105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930
In-text citation: (Demir, 2024)
Reference: Demir, Fatih "Evaluation of child development associate degree curriculum". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 6, no. 1, 2024, pp. 89-105. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425930
REFERENCES
  • Acar-Çiftçi, Y. (2020). Bridging knowledge and action in the workplace: an evaluation on internship learning outcomes of child development associate degree program students. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(3), 174-186. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n3p174
  • Aksu, B., Akandere, G., Çetin, C., & Demiralay, T. (2017). The importance of vocational schools in Turkey and evaluation of students’ attitudes. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 7(2), 287-306.
  • Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2009). Trends and emerging practices in general education. AACU. http://www.aacu.org/membership/documents/2009MemberSurvey_Part2.pdf
  • Bayburt University. (2021). Information package of associates’ degree course catalogue: Aydintepe vocational high school child care and youth services child development cources. Author.
  • Binici, H., & Arı, N. (2004). Seeking new perspectives in technical and vocational education. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 24(3), 383-396.
  • Bozkurt, B.Ü. (2017). An assessment framework on speaking skills of Turkish native speakers. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 5(4), 924-947.
  • Council of Higher Education. (2020). Yükseköğretim programları atlası 2020. [Atlas of higher education programs 2020]. Author. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/onlisans-program.php?b=30146
  • Council of Higher Education. (2021). Yükseköğretim programları atlası 2021. [Atlas of higher education programs 2021]. Author. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/onlisans-program.php?b=30146
  • Council of Higher Education. (2022). Yükseköğretim programları atlası 2022. [Atlas of higher education programs 2022]. Author. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/onlisans-program.php?b=30146
  • Council of Higher Education. (2023). Yükseköğretim programları atlası 2023. [Atlas of higher education programs 2023]. Author. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/onlisans-program.php?b=30146
  • Demir, S. (2012). Among the courses related to knowledge of teaching profession which are in the curriculum of the faculties of education evaluation of the instructional principles and methods course (Publication No: 317087) [Master’s dissertation, Gazi University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  • Eroğlu, F., & Kalaycı, N. (2020). Comparative evaluation of the distance and face-to-face education practices in the required Turkish language course at universities. Journal of MotherTongue Education, 8(3), 1001-1027.
  • Demirel, Ö. (2010). Kuramdan uygulamaya: Eğitimde program geliştirme [Theory to practice: Curriculum development in education]. Pegem.
  • Erden, M. (1998). Eğitimde program değerlendirme [Curriculum evaluation in education]. Anı.
  • Ergin, A., & Yağcı, Ö. (2003). An evaluation of the vocational school and short term higher education project of the Ministry of Education and Higher Education Council. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 25(25), 256-264.
  • Fraenkel, R. J., & Wallen, E. N. (2000). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.
  • Gülen, S., & Dönmez, İ. (2020). Determining the metaphors of the students in the child development program for the concepts of “child” and “child development. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 15(25), 3654-3683. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.654029
  • Günay, D., & Özer, M. (2016). The development of Turkish post-secondary vocational colleges in the 2000’s and the current challenges. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 6(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2016.138
  • İlhan, E., & Kalaycı, N. (2018). Evaluating core curricula implemented at undergraduate programs of universities. Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.18.014
  • İlhan, E., & Kalaycı, N. (2019). How to evaluate curricula in higher education? Designs based on four-stage evaluation and discrepancy models. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 9(3), 349-362. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2019.337
  • Keser, F., Akar, H. & Yıldırım, A. (2011). The role of extracurriculur activities in active citizenship education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(6), 809-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2011.591433
  • Kızılırmak, E. (2019). Investigation of academian opinions on Bologna proces in associate degree child development programs (Publication No: 606560) [Master’s dissertation, Atatürk University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  • Kumar, R. (2011). Araştırma yöntemleri [Research methods]. In Çokluk Ö., Şekercioğlu G. & Atak. H. (Eds.). Araştırma yöntemleri: Yeni başlayanlar için adım adım araştırma rehberi. [Research methods: A step by step research guide for beginners]. Edge.
  • Madaus, G.F, Scriven, M., & Stufflebam, D. L. (1983). Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. D.L Kluwer-Nijhoff.
  • Memduhoğlu, H. B., & Tanhan, F. (2013). Study of organisational factors scale’s validity and reliability affecting university students’ academic achievements. YYU Journal of Education Faculty, 10(1), 106-124.
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Ornstein, A. C. & Hunkins, F.P. (2004) Curriculum foundations: principles and theory. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Scriven, M. (1983). The methodology of evaluation. In B. Worthen & J. Sanders (Eds.) Educational evaluation: theory and practice (pp.39-83). Wadsworth.
  • Stewart, J., Charles-Casch, B., & William, I. (1985). Principles and Practices. WC Brown.
  • Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). The nature of program evaluation theory. In D. L. Stufflebeam & A. J. Shinkfield (Eds.), Evaluation: theory, models and applications (pp. 685-686). Jossey-Bass.
  • Tükel, A., & Yıldız, S. (2018). Examining attitudes of child development program students towards scientific activities. Journal of International Social Science Education, 4(2), 128-143.
  • Uskudar University. (2021). Vocational school of health services child development program content. Author. https://uskudar.edu.tr/sbf/assets/uploads/sbf/wp-content/uploads/cocuk-gelisimi-ders-icerikleri.pdf
  • Uşun, S. (2012). Eğitimde program değerlendirme: Süreçler yaklaşımlar ve modeller [Curriculum evaluation on education: Processes approaches and models] Anı.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin.
  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Qualitative research from start to finish. The Guilford.
  • Yüksel, İ., & Sağlam, M. (2012). Eğitimde program değerlendirme. [Curriculum evaluation in education]. Pegem.
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.