Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking
Inez Ponce de leon 1 *
More Detail
1 Department of Communication, School of Social Sciences, Ateneo de Manila University, Philippines
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2025 - Volume 7 Issue 1, pp. 18-32
https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475

Article Type: Research Article

Published Online: 19 Aug 2024

Views: 303 | Downloads: 180

ABSTRACT
Professors are often exhorted to foster an atmosphere in critical thinking in their classes, and there is a wide variety of lessons and activities that college students can be given in order to keep their questioning spirit alive. In this paper, the researcher sets critical thinking against the framework of Merton’s Norms of scientific practice. Robert Merton’s work has been used in the philosophy and sociology of science as a way to discuss what constitutes a scientific culture. The norms are summarized in the acronym CUDOs: Communalism (scientific knowledge is open to all), Universalism (that the practice of science is open to everyone), Disinterestedness (scientists do research for the greater good and not their personal gain), and Organized Skepticism (scientists always operate from a default of skepticism, and constantly question new findings in systematic ways.) These norms can be applied to tertiary classrooms to show students that scientific thinking is not monopolized by those in the scientific field, and that part of this scientific thinking is an organized, critical approach to appraising the world. The researcher provides examples from her own classes and assesses her practice and future directions for critical thinking instruction at the tertiary level.
KEYWORDS
Mertonian norms critical thinking science culture teaching research college teaching teaching science communication teaching belly dance
In-text citation: (Ponce de leon, 2025)
Reference: Ponce de leon, I. (2025). CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ponce de leon I. CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2025;7(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Ponce de leon I. CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2025;7(1):18-32. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475
In-text citation: (Ponce de leon, 2025)
Reference: Ponce de leon, Inez. "CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2025 7 no. 1 (2025): 18-32. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475
In-text citation: (Ponce de leon, 2025)
Reference: Ponce de leon, I. (2025). CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 7(1), pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475
In-text citation: (Ponce de leon, 2025)
Reference: Ponce de leon, Inez "CUDOs to the teachers: Using Merton’s norms of scientific practice to guide lessons in critical thinking". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2025, pp. 18-32. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202525475
REFERENCES
  • Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275-314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314551063
  • Alwehaibi, H. U. (2012). Novel program to promote critical thinking among higher education students: Empirical study from Saudi Arabia. Asian Social Science, 8(11), 193-204. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n11p193
  • Anderson, M. S., Ronning, E. A., De Vries, R, & Martinson, B. C. (2010). Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(3), 366-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2010.11779057
  • Bae, B. Y. (2018). In pursuit of transformative learning: Exploring the simulation of curiosity through critical reflection in the college classroom [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of San Diego, California.
  • Basillote, L. (2022, July 29). Raising a generation of critical thinkers requires some thinking, more doing. Philippine Star. https://www.philstar.com
  • Baylon, E. M. (2014). Effects of classroom assessment on the critical thinking and academic performance of students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 205-208.
  • Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Niu, L. (2011). Teaching critical thinking skills in higher education: A review of the literature. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 8(2), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v8i2.3554
  • Belecina, R. R., & Ocampo, J. M. (2018). Effecting change on students’ critical thinking in problem solving. EDUCARE: International Journal for Educational Studies, 10(2), 109-118.
  • Bellaera, L., Weinstein-Jones, Y., Ilie, S., & Baker, S. T. (2021). Critical thinking in practice: the priorities and practices of instructors teaching in higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100856
  • Benedicto, P. N. F., & Andrade, R. R. (2022). Problem-based learning strategies and critical thinking skills among pre-service teachers. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 2(2), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.53378/352885
  • Block, B. A., Russell, W. (2012). Teaching students to think critically about fitness and wellness choices. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, & Dance, 83(7), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2012.10598812
  • Bray, D., & von Storch, H. (2017). The normative orientations of climate scientists. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23, 1351-1367. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11948-014-9605-1
  • Brazel, J. (2020, November 14). Improving students’ critical thinking skills. The Philippine Daily Inquirer. http://www.inquirer.net
  • Brookfield, S. D. (2015). Teaching students to think critically about social media. In C. M. Wehlburg (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning (pp. 47-56). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20162
  • Dela Cruz, R. S. (2012, November 28). The lack of critical thinking in Philippine schools. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph
  • Enderun Colleges. (2018, June 30). 4 strategies international schools in The Philippines use to teach critical thinking. Author. https://www.enderuncolleges.com/
  • Fadhlullah, A., & Ahmad, N. (2017). Outside of the box: Determining students’ level of critical thinking skills in teaching and learning. Asian Journal of University Education, 13(2), 51-70.
  • Fernandez, S. D., & Padilla, P. P. (2020). Improving grade 7 students’ critical reading through explicit instruction of critical thinking. Alipato: A Journal of Basic Education, 11, 58-71.
  • Franco, A. R., Costa, P. S., Butler, H. A, & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Assessment of undergraduates’ real-world outcomes of critical thinking in everyday situations. Psychological Reports, 120(4), 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117701906
  • Hayes, W. H. (1990). Critical thinking through literature: A dialogue teaching model [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Massachusetts, Boston.
  • Hogan, N. M., & Sweeney, K. J. (2013). Social networking and scientific communication: A paradoxical return to Mertonian roots? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 644-646. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22842
  • IBON Foundation. (2018, October 5). Critical thinking under government attack, transformative education at risk. Author. https://www.ibon.org
  • Indrašiene, V., Jegeleviciene, V., Merfeldaite, O., Penkauskiene, D., Pivoriene, J., Railiene, A., Sadauskas, J., & Valaviciene, N. (2021). The value of critical thinking in higher education and the labour market: The voice of stakeholders. Social Sciences, 10, 286.
  • Kraus, S. Sears, S. R., & Burke, B. L. (2013). Is truthiness enough? Classroom activities for encouraging evidence-based critical thinking. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 13(2), 83-93.
  • Kumar, R. R., & James, R. (2015). Evaluation of critical thinking in higher education in Oman. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(3), 33-43.
  • Leest, B., & Maarten, H. J. W. (2021). Critical thinking, creativity and study results as predictors of selection for and successful completion of excellence programmes in Dutch higher education institutions. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(1), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1850310
  • Liu, O. L, Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12009
  • Lloyd, M., & Bahr, N. (2010). Thinking critically about critical thinking in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 9. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2010.040209
  • Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re-examining contemporary support among academics for Merton’s scientific norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 67-78. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10805-008-9055-y
  • Marquez, L. P. (2017). Critical thinking in Philippine education: What we have and what we need. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 15(2), 272-303.
  • Motz, B. A., Fyfe, E. R., & Guba, T. P. (2022, August 4). Learning to call bullsh*t via induction: Categorization training improves critical thinking performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 12(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000053
  • Mulnix, J. W. (2012). Thinking critically about critical thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 464-479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00673.x
  • Peach, B. E., Mukherjee, A., & Hornyak, M. (2007). Assessing critical thinking: A college’s journey and lessons learned. Journal of Education for Business, 82(6), 314-320. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.82.6.313-320
  • Ponce de Leon, I. (2024). Less prescription, more brainstorming: Teaching science and risk communication as a research class. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 6(1), 23-43. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpsp.202425431
  • Quintana, R., & Schunn, C. (2019). Who benefits from a foundational logic course? effects on undergraduate course performance. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 12(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2018.1543372
  • Shaheen, N. (2016). International students’ critical thinking–related problem areas: UK university teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Research in International Education, 15(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240916635895
  • Taguiam, F. A. T. (2022). Project CLASH: an aid in improving the critical thinking skills among Grade 11 learners. International Journal of Arts, Sciences and Education, 3, 121-126.
  • Terenzini, P. T. Springer, L., Pascarella, E. T., & Nora, A. (1995). Influences affecting the development of students' critical thinking skills. Research in Higher Education, 36(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02207765
  • Tsui, L. (1999). Courses and instruction affecting critical thinking. Research in Higher Education, 40(2), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018734630124
  • Tupas, T. R. F. (2003). History, language planners, and strategies of forgetting: the problem of consciousness in the Philippines. Language Problems & Language Planning, 27(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.27.1.02tup
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.