Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology
Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance
Irungu Cecilia 1 * , Josphat Kagema, Michael Gachahi 1
More Detail
1 Department of Education, Karatina University, Kenya
* Corresponding Author
Open Access Full Text (PDF)
ARTICLE INFO

Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2019 - Volume 1 Issue 1, pp. 33-44

Article Type: Review

Published Online: 20 May 2019

Views: 1296 | Downloads: 859

ABSTRACT
The roles of school principals have been focal in ensuring and promoting the performance of students in their schools, achieving and sustaining quality education.  This has been influenced by the paradigm shifts and global trends to ensure that the quality agenda as espoused in various international and national policies such as Sustainable Educational Goals. A cardinal role is ensuring on teacher supervision in curriculum implementation in their schools. The design of principals’ transformational leadership practices is evidenced to contribute in increased learners’ performance in national examinations as well as fostering transformative school environment. Instructional Leadership is significant in fostering teachers’ instructional practices and subsequently students’ learning and achievement. The aim of this study was to examine the role of principals in the supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’ performance. The study adopted the descriptive survey research design with a target population of 436 principals and 8,049 teachers from secondary schools in Murang’a and Kirinyaga Counties of Kenya. Purposive sampling was used to select 205 principals while 367 teachers were selected using stratified and then simple random sampling methods. The researcher used open and closed-ended questionnaires to collect quantitative data from the teachers and semi-structured interview schedules to gather qualitative data from principals. A pilot study of the instruments was conducted in two schools in Kiambu County of Kenya and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient with a threshold of 0.7 was used to determine the internal consistency of the items. The instruments yielded a reliability coefficient of 0.962, hence were considered reliable. Quantitative data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics with the aid of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. Hypotheses were tested at p>0.5 level of significance using Pearson Product Moment Correlation and t-test determined whether or not the means were statistically significant. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine whether the principals’ instructional leadership practice is a predictor of learners’ performance. The findings of the study were that the level of supervision of teaching was moderate and therefore had significant impact on learners’ performance. The study recommended that there is need for supervision of teaching. The research findings are of significance to principals in designing instructional strategies to improve learners’ performance and to policy makers in the education sector in designing policies that can support effective instructional leadership practices in schools.
KEYWORDS
Principals supervision teaching learners performance
In-text citation: (Cecilia et al., 2019)
Reference: Cecilia, I., Kagema, J., & Gachahi, M. (2019). Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(1), 33-44.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Cecilia I, Kagema J, Gachahi M. Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2019;1(1), 33-44.
In-text citation: (1), (2), (3), etc.
Reference: Cecilia I, Kagema J, Gachahi M. Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology. 2019;1(1):33-44.
In-text citation: (Cecilia et al., 2019)
Reference: Cecilia, Irungu, Josphat Kagema, and Michael Gachahi. "Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology 2019 1 no. 1 (2019): 33-44.
In-text citation: (Cecilia et al., 2019)
Reference: Cecilia, I., Kagema, J., and Gachahi, M. (2019). Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(1), pp. 33-44.
In-text citation: (Cecilia et al., 2019)
Reference: Cecilia, Irungu et al. "Principals’ supervision of teaching and its influence on promoting learners’
performance". Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, vol. 1, no. 1, 2019, pp. 33-44.
REFERENCES
  • Aker, J. C. & Isaac M. Mbiti, I. M. (2010). Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 207-32.
  • Aker, J. C., Ksoll, C., & Lybbert, T. J. (2012). Can mobile phones improve learning? Evidence from a field experiment in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 94-120.
  • Ankomah, T. L. (2002). A Study of Secondary Student’s Academic Performance at Senior School Certificate Examinations and Implications for Educational Planning and Policy in Nigeria. An International Multidisciplinary Journal, Ethiopia, 5(6), 314-333.
  • Best. W. & Kahn, J. (2006). Research in education: New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.
  • Gay, L.R. (1992). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (3rd ed.). Paris: Meril Publishing Company.
  • Glennerster, R., Kremer, M., Mbiti, I. & Takavarasha, K. (2011). Access and quality in the Kenyan education system: a review of the progress, challenges and potential solutions. Retrieved from https://www.povertyactionlab.org/sites/default/files/publications/Access%20and%20Quality%20in%20the%20Kenyan%20Education%20System%202011.06.22.pdf on 5 May 2019.
  • Glewwe, P., Park, A., & Zhao, M. (2006). The impact of eyeglasses on the academic performance of primary school students: Evidence from a randomized trial in rural China (Report No. 1685-2016-137082).
  • Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (2002) Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
  • Ho, D. C. W. (2010). Teacher participation in curriculum and pedagogical decisions: Insights into curriculum leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(5), 613–624.
  • Kagema, J. (2019). Evaluating Principals’ Role in Curriculum Supervision through Effective Transformative Leadership. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 1(1), 1-5. Retrieved from http://j-psp.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/1
  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
  • Leithwood, K. and Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: the contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528.
  • Ministry of Education (2005). Sessional paper No. 1 of 2005. A policy Framework for Education Training and Research. Meeting the challenges of Education Training and Research in Kenya in the 21st Century. Nairobi Kenya. Government Printers.
  • Murphy, J. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. In R. S. Lotto & P. W. Thurston (Eds.), Advances in educational administration: Changing perspectives on the school (Vol. 1, Pt. B pp. 163-200). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  • Nachmias, F. C & Nachmias, D (2009). Research methods in the social sciences. London. St.: Martin’s press, Inc.
  • Nyamongo, D. N., Sang, A., Nyaoga, R. B., & Matoke, Y. K. (2014). Relationship between School Based Factors and Students’ Performance in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Examination, in Masaba North District, Kenya. Unpublished Thesis, University of Nairobi.
  • Nannyonjo, H. (2007). Education input in Uganda: an analysis of factors ınfluencing learning achievement in grade six. Washington DC: World Bank.
  • Orodho, A. J. (2009). Elements of Education and Social Science Research Methods. Nairobi: Kanzeja/Mazola Publishers.
  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Education Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.
  • Shirley, D., Stanley, W. & Daniel, C. (2005). Statistics for Research (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  • UNESCO (2015). Fixing the broken promise of education for all. Findings from the global ınitiative on out-of-school children. Montreal: UNESCO.
LICENSE
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.